The Logic of Imperial Insanity and the Road to World War III by Andrew Gavin Marshall

The Logic of Imperial Insanity and the Road to World War III by Andrew Gavin Marshall



Andrew Gavin Marshall has written an exceptional piece of power elite analysis concerning the Bilderberg Group and the Rockefeller World Empire. It details the historic legacy and continuing impact these financial and governmental elites play in shaping our world today. Lew Rockwell is to be highly commended for publishing this monumental essay.

This article is essential reading in order to understand the background of what is emerging behind closed doors at the highest levels -- the concept of "global governance."

Marshall, in particular, outlines the pivotal role of tax-exempt foundations (such as the Rockefeller Foundation) in this process. These institutions have served as gatekeepers by establishing the perimeters of public policy debate, grant and endowment funding mechanisms, and providing cover for the long-standing covert strategic objectives of these elitists.


The curtain of disinformation and deceit drawn by the establishment media and court academia, shielding and manipulating the public as to the real history of the deliberate decline of the American republic. You will not find this vital information at The New York Times, The Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, or Fox News.

The Logic of Imperial Insanity and the Road to World War III by Andrew Gavin Marshall

The Logic of Imperial Insanity and the Road to World War III by Andrew Gavin Marshall



Andrew Gavin Marshall has written an exceptional piece of power elite analysis concerning the Bilderberg Group and the Rockefeller World Empire. It details the historic legacy and continuing impact these financial and governmental elites play in shaping our world today. Lew Rockwell is to be highly commended for publishing this monumental essay.

This article is essential reading in order to understand the background of what is emerging behind closed doors at the highest levels -- the concept of "global governance."

Marshall, in particular, outlines the pivotal role of tax-exempt foundations (such as the Rockefeller Foundation) in this process. These institutions have served as gatekeepers by establishing the perimeters of public policy debate, grant and endowment funding mechanisms, and providing cover for the long-standing covert strategic objectives of these elitists.


The curtain of disinformation and deceit drawn by the establishment media and court academia, shielding and manipulating the public as to the real history of the deliberate decline of the American republic. You will not find this vital information at The New York Times, The Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, or Fox News.

Nasty Nancy Nation by William L. Anderson

Nasty Nancy Nation by William L. Anderson

Why is Grace so afraid of the truth? Perhaps it is because Grace herself has had a problem with telling the truth in important situations. When Grace was a college student in the late 1970s, her fiancé was murdered; that much can be verified. Furthermore, Grace, whose shattered life was changed by that event, decided not to be an English major and went into law and became a Georgia prosecutor instead. Unfortunately, after that fact was established, Grace began to play fast and loose with the facts of the case.

Matthews: Weiner a WEINER in Trouble Because His Behavior Offends 'Culturally Backward' Christian Conservatives | NewsBusters.org

Can I be Frank . This hot dog Weiner is a joke. He must go , go , go !!!


http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2011/06/10/matthews-weiner-trouble-because-his-behavior-offends-culturally-ba

Trump and Huck out, now a new name looking to jump in

LOTS OF LUCK JUDGE :)

Billionaire Donald Trump is out of the 2012 GOP race, former Gov. Mike Huckabee is gone, but there's a new possible challenger.

Judge Roy Moore, a former state Supreme Court chief justice who twice has mounted gubernatorial campaigns in Alabama, has established an exploratory committee to consider a challenge to Barack Obama for the White House in 2012.

told WND that his campaign would be simple: telling people how he'd work on the problems facing America. And his administration, he said, would be simpler: just doing what he said.

"What most voters really are looking for is a candidate with the commitment to do what they'd said they would do," he told WND in an interview today. "The bottom line is they can believe I'll do what I say I'll do."


Moore, currently chief of the Foundation for Moral Law,drew national attention while serving as Alabama's state Supreme Court chief justice when he installed a monument depicting the Ten Commandments in the state's judicial building.

Activists including the Americans United for Separation of Church and State sued, and the dispute focused on whether a state is allowed to acknowledge God today. Moore argued it certainly was allowed earlier as all 50 state constitutions reference God.

Federal judge Myron Thompson ordered, "While the chief justice is free to keep whatever religious beliefs he chooses, the state (Alabama) cannot acknowledge the Judeo-Christian God or attribute to that God our religious freedom."
(Story continues below)


Moore stood fast, refusing to follow what he regarded as an unlawful order to remove the monument, explaining, according to his website, "Not only does every state constitution in some way acknowledge the sovereignty of God, but also the United States Constitution does so as well, in both the design of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and in United States Supreme Court case law.

"History is replete with recognition of the sovereignty of God by all three branches of the American government."
Moore became known as the Ten Commandments judge and now, in addition to his work for the Foundation for Moral Law, is a speaker and author of legal briefs. He has scheduled speaking engagements in most of the states where early voter selections will influence the 2012 race, including Iowa, he confirmed.
He told WND his campaign is needed because the nation today is sinking into a morass of decadence.

"Obama's pushing his own immoral values without regard to what the people think or believe," he said.

He cited Obama's work to allow open homosexuality in the military, undermine traditional marriage and make abortion more accessible.

His positions on issues:

On the economy, he wants smaller government and less spending to cut the deficit and allow economic growth. Tax reform is due, and the nation's needs to rebuild its manufacturing base.

On the law of the land: "All actions of state and federal officials must conform to the Constitution, and it should only be changed by amendments by the people, not the decisions of activist judges."

On taxes, he says, "The present system is neither fair nor economically productive. … The truth is we are being taxed to death while our businesses are failing and our economy continues to suffer."

On immigration, he says the U.S. must stop the open borders policies of the last two administrations. "We must allow willing states (like Arizona) to do their own job of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens."

On health care, he says, "We do not need socialized medicine."

He said military strength needs to be restored through funding for a missile defense system as well as other modern technological advances.

On homosexuality in the military, he says such behavior should be against military policy.

He also says Washington needs a refresher course in the Constitution, because presidents aren't allowed to dispatch U.S. troops wherever they would like.

The nation needs to develop its own energy supplies.

"The federal government should not hamper the education systems of various states, as there is no authority for federal involvement under the Constitution.
And regarding foreign affairs, "America should serve as a good example to other nations, not as a police force to force our will upon others."

Judge Roy Moore

"Our country is in a moral, economic and constitutional crisis which threatens our future and that of our children and grandchildren," he said. "Basic institutions of family, faith and freedom are under assault, and our leadership is divided by petty party politics and a special interest agenda.

"People are tired of politicians who say one thing running for office and then do something else once elected. They deserve leaders dedicated to principle – not the power of incumbency," he said.

On his website, Moore said he is testing the waters, "because I believe in America and in the American people. We can again be one nation under God with liberty and justice for all and bring a real, positive change to our government."

He was a key speaker during the recent election in Iowa where voters fired three state Supreme Court judges who had imposed their plans for homosexual "marriage" on voters.

He's been addressing tea party rallies around the country and said he's learned voters appear to be tired of politicians who speak out on the campaign trail and "forget those moral issues when they are elected."

Washington's lack of knowledge about the nation and its Constitution, and Washington's deliberate disobedience, is alarming, he said. The military action in Libya, he said, isn't constitutional.

Congress can declare war, but the president can only direct such military strikes without that approval in the case of an emergency.

Also, the Obama administration's refusal to secure the U.S. borders, is "just unconscionable."

Following the laws of the land, he pointed out, isn't a choice, even for the president.

He told WND he has coming speaking engagements in Iowa, South Carolina, Idaho, Texas, Maryland and other states, and he will make a decision sometime this summer.

"I'm learning that what I stand for is exactly what the American people seem to want," he told WND. "Somebody who will take a stand against tyranny."
As WND reported, Moore lit a fire in the hearts of tea partiers at the first national convention in Nashville, inspiring four impassioned standing ovations with his reading of a "bill of particulars" against President Obama.

He also told the cheering crowd, "We're tired of liberal Republicans who don't hold the principles of their party."

Moore, a periodic WND columnist and author of the book "So Help Me God," also has condemned "senseless treaties" like the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, and the Central America Free Trade Agreement, known as CAFTA. He said the nation's borders have been opened to criminals and terrorists, the Constitution discarded, the federal government has grown in size and scope "far beyond anything our founders ever imagined," and the nation's debt is soaring.

Columnist, author and action film star Chuck Norris endorsed Moore's campaign for governor.

"More than just an amazing legal mind, he is first a true patriot and passionate family man," Norris wrote at the time.

He said Moore is one of the "constitutionally abiding legal eagles who walk in the legacy of our Founding Fathers and who we need serving in every state across our union."

Moore grew up the son of a jackhammer operator. He bagged groceries for 85 cents an hour at Piggly Wiggly to support his family and later attended the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Moore commanded an Army military police company in Vietnam from 1969 to 1974.

He graduated from the University of Alabama School of Law and worked as a deputy district attorney for Etowah County from 1977 to 1982.

After an unsuccessful bid for circuit judge in 1982, Moore worked on a ranch in Australia and became a kick boxer in Texas before returning to Alabama to practice law.

The Falling Bottom Line by Gerald Celente

The Falling Bottom Line by Gerald Celente

But it wasn’t the stereotypical Middle Eastern-style corruption of vulgar Arab sheiks doing dirty deals behind closed doors with shifty business moguls. In Europe, corruption was refined, honorable, prudent and openly practiced. It was called “banking.”

Legal, state-sanctioned European financial corruption that made more billions for billionaires and mega-millions for multi-millionaires had crashed or crippled many EU member countries

'Why Did Police Kill My Dad?' by William Norman Grigg

'Why Did Police Kill My Dad?' by William Norman Grigg

"Given that the marksmanship of the typical tax-feeder is on a par with that of the Imperial Stormtroopers from Star Wars, it’s likely that only a handful of the gunshots hit their marks, but that was enough. Jose was killed before he could pull the trigger. That doesn't alter the fact that he died on his feet, with his face to the enemy as he shielded his family against criminal aggression.

Neither Jose nor Vanessa had a criminal record. Nobody in their household took part in commerce involving non-government-approved mood-altering substances, and no evidence was found to suggest otherwise.

In the immediate aftermath of the murder, Jose’s killers – in keeping with established custom – began to traduce the victim's reputation, claiming that the slain husband and father was a violent suspect who had fired the first shot, and that a ballistic shield had probably saved the life of one of the assailants. This version of events was dutifully regurgitated by an initially uncritical local media.
Jose’s reputation was allowed to steep in that falsehood for several days before the PCSO grudgingly admitted the truth. "A deputy’s bullet struck the side of the doorway, causing chips of wood to fall on his shield," recounted the Arizona Daily Star, paraphrasing an account provided by PCSO functionary Michael O’Connor. "That prompted some members of the team to think the deputy had been shot."
The PCSO wasn’t through bemerding the memory of Jose Geurena, however.

In the new version peddled by the department, Guerena supposedly used his final seconds this side of eternity to channel Tony Montana, crouching down and growling: "I have something for you!"

The people who gunned Jose down – who are hardly disinterested witnesses – claim that he knew that he was drawing bead on law enforcement personnel. This is not what happened, even though Jose had every moral and legal right to use lethal force to defend his home from an unlawful invasion. "